Featured in this comparison chart are two outstanding smartbands, the fine-looking Galaxy Fit from Samsung and the award winning Charge 3 from Fitbit. These two smartbands (perhaps we should call the Charge 3 a smartwatch, its more equipped and slightly oversize compare to smartbands) are some of the best choices right now if you’re looking for a comprehensive tracker that can help you achieve more fitness goals. Moreover, each of these two has a quite impressive long battery life that lets you go longer from a single charge. The Samsung Galaxy Fit vs Fitbit Charge 3 specs, features and price – which should you buy?
Table of Contents
Samsung Galaxy Fit vs Fitbit Charge 3: Specifications Compared
| Product Info |
 Samsung Galaxy Fit Specifications, Features and Price |
 Fitbit Charge 3 Specifications, Features and Price |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $94.97 | $110.00 |
| ABOUT DEVICE | ABOUT DEVICE | ABOUT DEVICE |
| Device name | Samsung Galaxy Fit | Fitbit Charge 3 |
| Device type | Fitness smartband | Fitness smartband |
| Gender | Unisex | Unisex |
| Release date | June, 2019 | August, 2018 |
| Predecessor | — | Fitbit Charge 2 |
| Successor | — | Fitbit Charge 4 |
| Versions | — | Fitbit Charge 3 (special edition) |
| BODY | BODY | BODY |
| Dimension | 44.6 x 18.3 x 11.2 mm | 38 x 18.3 x 11.8 mm |
| Weight | 23 grams (excluding straps) | 30 grams |
| Shape | Rectangular | Rectangular |
| Case material | Aluminum | Plastic Resin |
| Strap material | Silicone | Elastomer, Polyester |
| Bezel material | Aluminum | Plastic Resin |
| Strap size | 20 mm | 140 – 180mm (small), 180 -220mm (big) |
| Screen protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Water resistance | Yes, 5ATM | Yes, 5ATM |
| Durability test | MIL-STD-810G | — |
| Swim-proof | Yes, recommended | Yes, recommended |
| Color | Black, White | Black, Lavender, White |
| DISPLAY | DISPLAY | DISPLAY |
| Display size | 0.95 inches | 1.57 inches |
| Display type | AMOLED, Full color | Monochromic, OLED |
| Display resolution | 120 x 240 px | — |
| Pixel density | — | — |
| Always on | No | No |
| Custom watch face | Yes | Yes |
| Input type | 1 Physical button, Touchscreen | 1 Physical button, Touchscreen |
| CONNECTIVITY | CONNECTIVITY | CONNECTIVITY |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth v5.0 | Bluetooth v4.0 |
| Bluetooth calling | No | No |
| GPS | No | (connected GPS), No |
| NFC | — | (special edition), Yes |
| Wi-Fi | No | No |
| MEMORY | MEMORY | MEMORY |
| RAM | 2MB | — |
| ROM | 32MB | — |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| CELLULAR CONNECTIVITY | CELLULAR CONNECTIVITY | CELLULAR CONNECTIVITY |
| Technology | None | None |
| SIM type | None | None |
| Band | — | — |
| NOTIFICATIONS | NOTIFICATIONS | NOTIFICATIONS |
| SMS alert | Yes | Yes |
| Calls alert | Yes | Yes |
| Email alert | Yes | Yes |
| Event reminder | Yes | Yes |
| Third-party apps alert | Yes | Yes |
| MEDIA | MEDIA | MEDIA |
| Audio | No | No |
| Bluetooth music | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | No | No |
| Microphone | No | No |
| Camera | No | No |
| Radio | No | No |
| SENSORS | SENSORS | SENSORS |
| Accelerometer | Yes | Yes |
| Altimeter | No | Yes |
| Ambient light | No | No |
| Barometer | No | — |
| Compass | No | — |
| ECG | No | No |
| Gyroscope | Yes | — |
| HRM | Yes | Yes |
| Pulse oximeter (SpO2) | No | Yes |
| Thermometer | No | No |
| Other sensors | — | Vibration motor |
| ACTIVITY TRACKING | ACTIVITY TRACKING | ACTIVITY TRACKING |
| Blood oxygen | No | Yes |
| Blood Pressure | No | No |
| Calories | Yes | Yes |
| Distance | Yes | Yes |
| ECG tracking | No | No |
| Heart rate monitoring | Yes | Yes |
| Sleep tracking | Yes | Yes |
| Steps | Yes | Yes |
| Floors climbed | - | Yes |
| Stress | Yes | Yes |
| Incidental fall detection | No | No |
| Menstrual cycle | No | Yes |
| VO2 Max | No | Yes |
| Swim-tracking | Yes | Yes |
| Underwater heart rate tracking | No | No |
| On-screen workout | No | No |
| Sport modes | 90 | 15 |
| BATTERY | BATTERY | BATTERY |
| Battery type | Non-removable Li-ion battery | non-removable Lithium-polymer |
| Battery capacity | 120mAh | — |
| Battery life | Regular: 5 days+, Standby:10 days+ | Regular: 7 days+, Standby:10 days+ |
| Charging type | Charging dock | Charging dock |
| Charging time | 1-2 hours | 2hrs |
| Solar power | No | No |
| PLATFORM | PLATFORM | PLATFORM |
| Chipset | — | — |
| CPU | MCU Cortex M33F 96MHz / M0+ 16MHz | — |
| GPU | — | — |
| Operating system | RTOS | Fitbit OS |
| MISC | MISC | MISC |
| Companion app | Samsung Gear app | Fitbit App |
| Compatibility | Android 5.0+, iOS 10.0+ | Android, iOS |
| Payment system | None | Fitbit Pay |
| Interchangeable strap | 20mm, Yes | Yes |
| Voice command | No | No |
| Find my phone | Yes | Yes |
| Box content | Charger, Manual, Samsung Galaxy Fit, Straps | Charger, Fitbit Charge 3, Manual, Straps |
| Price | $94.97 | $110.00 |
Samsung Galaxy Fit vs Fitbit Charge 3: Which is Better?
Each of these two is stylish, sleek, lightweight and fitness-focused with long battery life. However, the Charge 3 with its larger display will allow you see more at glance. This comes handy while you’re on the go and need to catch a glimpse of the screen, although the Galaxy Fit with AMOLED display has a better display that’s interesting to watch under low light.
Each of these two is also fitness-focused and will track your daily activities comprehensively. The Charge 3 seems to be a more comprehensive tracker with blood oxygen tracking and menstrual cycle logging, although the Galaxy Fit has more preloaded sport modes. The Charge 3 has a slight longer battery life than the Galaxy Fit which keeps you going longer.
In all, the Charge 3 is a better device, but I’ll go with the Samsung Galaxy Fit – it’s cheaper, yet a fine-looking smartband, comprehensive fitness tracker and has a long battery life.
Samsung Galaxy Fit vs Fitbit Charge 3: Editor’s Pick
